In partnership with
Good Afternoon. The White House asked for $87.6 billion in June, including $21 billion to replace munitions spent in Operation Epic Fury. Congress has not appropriated a dollar. The stopgap signed September 2 runs to December 11 and carries no war money at all.
Was this email forwarded to you? Sign up here
🎯 THE SIGNAL
The supplemental request has been sitting since June 24. AP reported last week that it has idled, and nobody expects real movement until after November 3. The stopgap funds the government at prior-year levels through December 11 and leaves out the obligation authority the White House wanted for PAC-3, Tomahawk, AMRAAM, and two SM-3 variants. That request came with a warning about cancellation liabilities on multiyear contracts if the government stops ordering negotiated quantities. Appropriators passed anyway.
Most people reading the supplemental fight treat the missing money as the problem. Look at delivery timelines, and that stops holding up.
CSIS ran the numbers in May. Tomahawks funded in FY2027 arrive after 34 months of production lead time, putting them in March 2030. SM-3 and SM-6 take 36 to 39 months to begin deliveries once Congress appropriates. Patriots funded in FY2027 start showing up in May 2029. An appropriation that passes in December buys deliveries landing in 2029 and 2030, so the replenishment schedule is already set no matter what the lame duck does. CSIS put it plainly: the problem today isn't money, it's time.
The other assumption worth checking is that production lines are sitting idle waiting for orders. Lockheed delivered a record 620 PAC-3 MSEs in 2025 and signed a seven-year framework in January to take annual capacity from roughly 600 to 2,000. RTX signed its own frameworks in February covering SM-6 above 500 a year, Tomahawk above 1,000, and AMRAAM at 1,900 or better. Northrop delivered about 13,000 solid rocket motors in 2024 and wants 25,000 a year by 2029.
The real constraint sits below all of that. Ammonium perchlorate has one meaningful North American producer, AMPAC in Cedar City, Utah, running a single facility with about 170 employees. Some nozzles take seven to ten months to source. Energetics and propellants run about a year. Qualifying a second source for HTPB binder takes 18 months to two years after somebody funds it.
Propellant cure time is three to fourteen days, so curing is not what slows anything down. The people are. Energetics workforce proficiency runs up to seven years, and last October an explosion at Accurate Energetic Systems in Tennessee killed sixteen.
Chart comparing the appropriations fight to munitions lead times, all in months. Days to the December 11 continuing resolution cliff: about 2.4 months. Tomahawk deliveries begin 34 months after Congress appropriates. SM-3 and SM-6 deliveries begin 36 to 39 months after appropriation. Bringing an energetics worker to full proficiency takes up to 84 months.
Development | What It Means for You |
|---|---|
No war money appropriated, 73 days to the December 11 cliff | Stop modeling FY2027 revenue off the supplemental. Build the case that survives it not passing until spring. |
CSIS puts SM-3 and SM-6 at 36 to 39 months from appropriation | If you sit in that supply chain, your 2027 capacity questions are really 2029 delivery questions. Price accordingly. |
The CR bars new multiyear starts | Any pitch that depends on a new multiyear award is parked until at least December. Reprice it or move it. |
AMPAC's expansion line lands around year end | Ammonium perchlorate is the chokepoint with a date on it. Ask your prime what allocation looks like in Q1. |
The money everyone is waiting on buys 2029 deliveries, and a single chemical plant in Utah is setting the pace more than Congress is.
🤝PARTNERED WITH
7 Stocks Built to Hold Forever. See the Full List.
Chasing the next hot stock can be exhausting, and it rarely builds wealth the way investors expect. The strongest long-term portfolios are often anchored by durable, blue-chip businesses designed to withstand recessions, inflation and shifting market leadership.
MarketBeat’s free 7 Stocks to Buy and Hold Forever report identifies companies across technology, retail, consumer staples, healthcare, networking, sporting goods and utilities. Each offers its own mix of stability, income, growth and staying power.
These are not speculative names built around the latest headline. They are established businesses selected for investors who would rather own quality companies for years than constantly chase the market.
Get your complimentary copy and see all seven names today.
💰MONEY MOVES
Capacity money that has already moved while the supplemental sits.
L3Harris signed a seven-year PAC-3 MSE propulsion framework in July worth about $4.7B, undefinitized, to nearly triple motor output. A companion agreement quadruples THAAD propulsion.
The Department of War closed $1B in convertible preferred stock in L3Harris Missile Solutions on April 23, the old Aerojet Rocketdyne business, with warrants attached. It converts at an IPO planned for the back half of this year, and L3Harris keeps about 80 percent.
Northrop Grumman entered $3B in multiyear framework agreements on August 3 to accelerate PAC-3 MSE motor production at Allegany Ballistics Laboratory in West Virginia. The company says it has doubled tactical motor capacity since 2021 and plans to triple by 2027.
Lockheed Martin is expanding its Camden, Arkansas workforce by half to support the PAC-3 ramp.
📡OPPORTUNITY RADAR
The lame-duck supplemental — House and Senate Appropriations
What happens: the CR expires December 11, five weeks after the midterms, in a session that may have a different Congress in it. The $21B munitions line rides on that package or waits for FY2027 appropriations.
Who should care: anyone in the interceptor, cruise missile, or motor supply chain, and anyone whose FY2027 plan assumed war money.
What to do: document your cancellation liability exposure now. The White House made that argument once, and appropriators passed on it, so the December version needs numbers behind it instead of assertion.
AMPAC capacity expansion — Cedar City, Utah
What happens: the $100M expansion adds more than 50 percent ammonium perchlorate capacity, with the line expected to come online toward the end of 2026.
Who should care: every solid rocket motor producer and every new entrant planning qualified production lots.
What to do: ask where you sit in the allocation queue before the capacity exists. New entrants go to the back of the line at shared suppliers, and L3Harris's CEO has said so out loud.
🧭PEOPLE & POSTURE
The supplemental runs through appropriators, not the armed services committees. Same room that stripped the munitions obligation authority out of the September stopgap. Anyone planning to make the replenishment case in December should know it already failed once with that audience.
Watch the L3Harris Missile Solutions IPO this quarter. A government convertible preferred position converting at a public offering is a new structure for the motor business, and its pricing tells you what the market thinks capacity expansion is worth.
📊READER PULSE
This issue's question. One tap, anonymous, results Thursday.
Where does your FY2027 plan assume the munitions supplemental lands?
🔮PREDICTIONS
Record: 3–1.
Still open. More than one design carried out of CCA Increment 2 concept refinement into prototyping, called September 1, with prototyping awards landing next year. At least one GSA vehicle announcing an on-ramp or scope expansion citing the NITAAC transition before December 31, called September 15.
New call, made today. Congress does not enact the $21 billion munitions line before December 31, 2026. Probability band 70 to 80 percent. Confidence moderate-high. The supplemental has idled since June, the stopgap already refused the narrower obligation authority, and a lame duck five weeks past a midterm is a poor venue for an unpopular war bill. Resolution requires an enacted appropriation containing war munitions replenishment, signed on or before December 31.
A full-year FY2027 appropriations act carrying that money counts.
⭐TIP OF THE SPEAR PRO
Something from the CR guide that bears on the above. Multiyear procurement authority does not come from an appropriation. It comes from the NDAA under 10 U.S.C. 3501, and the FY2027 bill has not moved since a cloture vote on the motion to proceed failed 50 to 46 on July 14. CRS reported on September 1 that the Senate had taken no further procedural steps.
The seven-year frameworks everyone keeps citing are not contracts. 19FortyFive made that point in July, and the announcements themselves describe demand signals to the supply chain rather than orders. Turning one into a multiyear contract that locks supplier pricing takes authority the Senate has not passed. The stopgap separately bars starting new multiyear buys with advance procurement funding until December 11 at the earliest.
If you are pricing against a framework as though it were a commitment, that is the gap to close with your prime before Q1.
Pro members have the full guide, including the anomaly process and the 388-to-13 approval record behind it.
THE LAST WORD
Seven years is the number I keep coming back to. That is how long it takes to bring an energetics worker to full proficiency, and it is longer than the span between the FY2027 appropriation and the deliveries it buys.
Congress can appropriate $21 billion in an afternoon. It cannot appropriate somebody who has been mixing propellant since 2019. Every capacity conversation I have watched this year has been about dollars and floor space, and the one constraint nobody can buy their way out of barely comes up.
If you run a line that touches energetics, let me know what your hiring pipeline actually looks like. Hit reply. Anonymity guaranteed.
Semper Fi,
— Justin